In medication, there’s virtually no such factor as a free lunch. Nearly each drug or intervention may have its negative effects.
Ideally, rigorous research and the regulatory course of will be certain that an permitted drug’s advantages clearly outweigh any potential harms. However typically, researchers (and sufferers) will uncover negative effects that went unnoticed throughout the approval course of. Different instances, extra not often, a drug’s maker is revealed to have buried incriminating details about their drug’s harms from the general public or to have created a product that doesn’t work in any respect as supposed. And when that occurs, a nasty or ineffective remedy can spark a significant scandal.
There’s no scarcity of pharmaceutical scandals which have occurred through the years, however to maintain issues brief, let’s simply give attention to a few of the largest ones to have occurred on this quarter-century.
1. Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder merchandise
For many years, individuals had unsuccessfully tried to sue J&J over its client merchandise containing talc, significantly child powder, claiming that the merchandise had contributed to their cancers.
In 2018, nonetheless, an explosive report from Reuters found the corporate had hidden proof that the talc it used may typically comprise detectable ranges of asbestos, a recognized carcinogen. The report helped gasoline a brand new wave of lawsuits and rising public mistrust within the firm’s child powder merchandise. Within the years since, the corporate has repeatedly lost civil fits over its talc merchandise, some totaling into the billions, and its appeals continued to fail, even earlier than the Supreme Court.
Although J&J has maintained that its merchandise are secure, the corporate ultimately eliminated talc from all its powder manufacturers (as an alternative utilizing cornstarch), tried and failed to cowl its legal responsibility over these lawsuits by having a subsidiary declare chapter, and even this 12 months has continued to lose court docket circumstances tying its merchandise to individuals’s most cancers.
Curiously sufficient, although asbestos is thought to trigger most cancers, previous analysis hasn’t discovered a transparent hyperlink between talc as a complete (together with asbestos-free talc) and most cancers, and there stays some disagreement over the extent of the chance posed by talcum powder merchandise. The American Most cancers Society states that if talc can increase an individual’s threat of ovarian most cancers (the first kind of most cancers linked to talc), the “total improve is prone to very be small” for a person lady. The World Well being Group has acknowledged that asbestos-containing talc must be thought-about carcinogenic, whereas talc generally is “probably carcinogenic.”
2. Biogen and the Alzheimer’s drug that wasn’t
In June 2021, the FDA approved Biogen and Eisai’s antibody-based Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm. At first look, the approval ought to have been excellent news: the primary drug of its variety, and one supposed to truly goal a key driver of the degenerative dysfunction, beta amyloid. However really, it was something however.
In a uncommon transfer on the time, the FDA went in opposition to the suggestions of its knowledgeable advisory panel, who voted in opposition to approval. The surface consultants rightly famous that the information supporting the drug’s effectiveness was blended at finest. The FDA additionally granted Aduhelm accelerated approval, a particular class that requires much less rigorous proof. Media outlet STAT Information later uncovered an unusually friendly relationship between high Biogen workers and FDA officers, which prompted a Congressional investigation into the matter. And so as to add insult to harm, Biogen initially set Aduhelm’s checklist worth at $56,000 a 12 months—a value excessive sufficient to probably devastate the pockets of sufferers and Medicare if the drug noticed widespread use amongst older Individuals.
Many doctors quickly rebelled in opposition to the approval, refusing to prescribe it to their sufferers, whereas Medicare determined to severely prohibit its protection of the drug. Biogen ultimately gave up attempting to make Aduhelm a factor, following years of poor gross sales, and pulled the drug from the market in early 2024.
This saga does have a little bit of a cheerful ending, a minimum of. There have been different related medicine developed and permitted lately, and in contrast to Aduhelm, these medicine do appear to have an actual, if nonetheless modest, effect on treating the situation.
3. Purdue Pharma and OxyContin
Purdue Pharma has maybe develop into probably the most notorious poster baby for the opioid disaster.
Its blockbuster drug, OxyContin, helped gasoline rising charges of opioid use dysfunction following its launch to the general public in 1996. And although there are various drivers of the disaster, together with the proliferation of stronger brokers like fentanyl in later years, the corporate did ultimately admit to downplaying the addictive threat of its merchandise, paying medical doctors unlawful kickbacks to prescribe their medicine, and turning a blind eye to the widespread diversion of its medicine from pharmacies to the black market.
Following a glut of civil and federal lawsuits over OxyContin, Purdue Pharma shuttered its doorways, and its sole house owners—the Sackler household—agreed to pay out greater than $4 billion as a part of a far-reaching settlement in 2021. The courts bumped this up to $6 billion in 2023. That settlement, nonetheless, additionally offered immunity from additional civil prices in opposition to the Sacklers themselves. And although the state of affairs has lastly started to enhance as of late, roughly 50,000 Individuals nonetheless died from opioid overdoses final 12 months.
4. Martin Shkreli’s drug worth surge
Typically the scandals aren’t concerning the medicine themselves, however what they’re being offered for.
In 2015, Martin Shkreli grew to become public enemy primary when his firm, Turing Prescription drugs, purchased the anti-parasitic and anti-HIV drug Daraprim and raised its $13.50 price tag per pill by over 5,000 percent. Shkreli’s cocky, unrepentant perspective towards his many critics earned him the nickname of the “Pharma bro.”
Mockingly sufficient, his preliminary downfall had nothing to do with Daraprim. Quickly after he grew to become notorious, federal prosecutors in New York charged Shkreli with securities fraud, and in 2017, he was convicted and sentenced to seven years of federal jail.

Although Shkreli was launched early in 2022, his firm’s administration of Daraprim did later come again to chew him. In 2020, the FTC and others sued the corporate, now referred to as Vyera Prescription drugs after Shkreli’s imprisonment, alleging that it carried out an “elaborate anticompetitive scheme” to keep up its monopoly on the drug. The corporate reached a settlement with the FTC a 12 months later, and the authorized battle ultimately required Shkreli himself to pay out a $64 million nice and to avoid the pharmaceutical business totally. In 2023, Vyera declared chapter and sold the rights to Daraprim. Final 12 months, the U.S. Supreme Courtroom snubbed Shkreli’s try and dismiss his private nice and ban.
Don’t really feel too dangerous for Shkreli, although. Since his launch from jail, he’s been busy attempting to shill crypto and AI knockoffs of WebMD.
5. Abbott’s tainted child components

In early 2022, the FDA warned households to avoid sure powdered child formulation produced by the corporate Abbott Vitamin. The merchandise, it seems, have been contaminated by Cronobacter micro organism.
A number of kids have been hospitalized, and two infants who had consumed the merchandise later died. Abbott issued a widespread recall of its merchandise and shut down its components manufacturing facility in Sturgis, Michigan. The FDA’s investigation concluded that Abbott had failed to keep up sanitary situations and that the ability had a minimum of eight latest situations of Cronobacter contamination relationship again to 2019.
It could take 4 months for the corporate’s Sturgis plant to reopen, following an settlement with the FDA to overtake its security practices, the size of which helped contribute to a nationwide components scarcity that 12 months. Lawmakers on either side additionally criticized the FDA for its delayed response to the disaster, for the reason that company first caught wind of potential points as early as September 2021.
Although there haven’t been related recollects or reported outbreaks since, an in depth ProPublica report in April 2025 interviewed employees who claimed that the Sturgis plant continues to have severe security and sanitary dangers to today. One worker reported what they discovered to the FDA, but it surely’s unclear whether or not the brand new Trump administration will take motion.
6. Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos
Elizabeth Holmes based the corporate Theranos in 2003. It centered across the growth of a tool supposed to make blood assessments simpler than ever. With just some drops of blood from a single finger prick, Holmes claimed, her firm’s “Edison” machine may precisely detect a litany of well being situations. By the mid-2010s, Holmes’ advertising and marketing of Theranos had allowed her to develop into a darling of the biotech world: a younger, self-made entrepreneur styled after Steve Jobs, who at one level was value almost $5 billion.
The difficulty was, because the world ultimately discovered, it was all primarily based on falsehoods. Beginning in late 2015, Wall Avenue Journal reporter John Carreyrou exposed the fraudulent practices of Holmes and Theranos. Although Holmes had struck a partnership with retail chain Walgreens in 2013 to offer the Edison machine to its prospects, the Edison may merely by no means do what Holmes claimed it may. And ultimately, the corporate secretly resorted to utilizing different commercially obtainable machines to carry out most of its blood testing providers.
Holmes’ deception didn’t simply mislead buyers; a number of individuals reported that the defective check outcomes offered by Theranos made them fearful about having medical situations they didn’t even have, similar to HIV, or in any other case harmed their well being.
Holmes was convicted of investor fraud and different prices over Theranos in 2022 and was sentenced to an 11-year stint in jail (later reduced by two years), whereas her co-executive and one-time romantic accomplice Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani was sentenced to just about 13 years the following month. As of this 12 months, she’s made her return to social media (by way of having another person publish her phrases).
Trending Merchandise
Zalman P10 Micro ATX Case, MATX PC ...
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 Gaming Laptop, ...
HP 17.3″ FHD Business Laptop ...
Lenovo IdeaPad 1 Scholar Laptop com...
TP-Hyperlink AXE5400 Tri-Band WiFi ...
NETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi 6 Router (RA...
